More Half-Blood Prince Reviews: Guardian Three Stars out of Five, More
July 04, 2009, 03:57 PM
Over the past few weeks, screenings for Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Place for the press have taken place world wide. A few more early reviews are beginning to trickle online, with articles from the Guardian and UK tabloid the Sun now online.
The Sun gives glowing, while sometimes vague remarks in their article, praising the use of comedy and romance (Hogwarts is Snogwarts!) and giving kudos to Bonnie Wright as Ginny, and Hero Fiennes-Tiffin (Young Voldemort). The piece summarizes "Rather than giving us a series of computer-generated action sequences (yawn
again), Yates has gone for careful character development, building to a
dramatic crescendo. And that is the biggest surprise of all - The Half-Blood
Prince is masterful."
While still generally postive, a more subdued review can be found in the Guardian which gave the film three stars out of five. The bottom line reads: "Putatively winsome all this [romance] may be, but what it actually does is throw
the series' biggest weakness into sharp relief: film-making can (and
does) control pretty much everything – except how the cute juvenile
leads grow up. Still, director David Yates knows how to play all the
cards. Although a touch ungainly, his film is solidly constructed, with
lots of fine effects. If, as Potter approaches his final confrontation
with Voldemort, the wizardly battles begin to resemble Lord of the
Rings, it's hardly a handicap; this is tried and tested cinematic
language, and does all it needs.
The Guardian is like our local paper. If the reviews are awful, the film or play is usually really good. if the reviewer loves it, it is usually pretty awful!
As Moose_Starr said, a movie reviewer simply expresses his/her individual opinion. In the case of Transformers, the audience has the last word on whether a film is “good”, by spending money to see it in the theaters. We, the fans, have a closer connection to this movie than the average movie-goer, so we may feel slighted when reviews aren’t wholly positive of it, but we’ll still see it.
From the moment I became HP fan , I made myself not to believe to everything that’s written in the press!!
Journalists some time write their own opinione and even don’t think about the feelings of people who would read their article!!!
Yeah, from the first moment I have read HBP I gessed that alot of ,,not so understanding,, people will say that it had spoiled,some of people won’t be able understand what is going on and that there wounld be a lot of “WHYs?”
I have prepared myself to everything and I know exactly one thing
for me IT DOESN"T PLAIES ANY SENSE WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT HP BOOKS< FILMS< ACTORS I LIKE IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Starlesswinter, I understand what you’re saying about relationships in the series. However, I’m trying to remember where in the books Harry says he loves Ginny or that they were soulmates. He obviously cared for her, and their time together meant a lot to him and his happiness. Was it love at the time? Probably not, but it still meant enough that her face was the last thing he saw before he “died.” JK. Rowling isn’t Stephanie Meyer. Harry and Ginny never called each other soulmates after a week of dating. Their lust probably developed into love long after the war was over. Isn’t that how most relationships start?
As for critics (I’m not commenting towards any one poster now), their words do have merit. The success of the second Transformer movie only proves that people wanted to see it, not whether they enjoyed it. In fact, it’s possible that the new Ice Age movie could actually beat it this weekend, so obviously not everyone wanted to see it a second time. So HBP’s initial success will not be based on what critics think, but it’s long term success could. Word of mouth is important if you want to stay number 1 for more than a week.
Snogwarts … heh heh.
Still laughing about “Snogwarts” … Hehe.
This movie is going to be amazing! 8-)
I always reserve my true feelings, until I see the movie….reviews are “personal opinions”…no matter how well written or “unbiased” they wish to be….
I’ll make up my own mind. But I have to say, things are looking pretty good!
10 more days….YAHOO!
These reviews were pretty fair enough I’ve no idea why people are suddenly getting up in arms about them. They seemed pretty on the mark when you look at them objectively. I think were still on course for a very good movie. Can’t wait for Total Film’s review, it’s the one I usually count on
Hi Potter fans.
I’ve posted a fairly positive review of Half-Blood Prince on my website, thought you might like to read it:
Apologies if you think this is spam, but it’s hard to try and compete with the big names like The Guardian and The Sun! Plus I go into much more detail than they do! Hope you enjoy the review, and the film!
Sorry kid, but the fact that you call yourself and your blog the “shiznit” pretty much guarantees that I won’t take your opinion seriously.
it should be getting 5/5. film critics often hate big movies. and they luv there character development
I’ll probably agree about the 3 out of 5 once I see the movie I fear.
So now character development is a bad thing?
What is the world coming to?
snogwarts…..5 stars definitely…..